Material misstatement definition
/What is a Material Misstatement?
A material misstatement is information in the financial statements that is sufficiently incorrect that it may impact the economic decisions of someone relying on those statements. For example, a material misstatement of revenue could trigger a decision to buy a company's stock, causing losses for the investor when the misstatement is later corrected and the price of the stock declines.
Material misstatements typically arise from one of the following events:
Inaccurate data collection or data processing, which is then summarized into the financial statements.
A presentation of a financial statement line item or account that does not comply with the applicable accounting framework.
A missing financial statement line item or account.
An incorrect accounting estimate, perhaps due to a misinterpretation of the facts or an oversight.
Unreasonable management judgments relating to an accounting estimate, or the manner in which accounting policies are used.
A financial statement disclosure that does not comply with the applicable accounting framework, or which is not disclosed at all.
When an auditor finds a material misstatement and management does not correct it, the auditor should evaluate the effect of the misstatement on the financial statements and decide whether it is necessary to modify his or her auditor’s opinion.
Related AccountingTools Courses
Example of a Material Misstatement
Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the U.S., was found to have materially misstated its financial reports due to a fraudulent sales practice. From 2002 to 2016, employees created millions of fake bank and credit card accounts without customer consent to meet aggressive sales targets. The fraudulent accounts led to inflated revenue figures and misleading financial statements. In addition, the company failed to disclose the risks and unethical sales practices in its financial reports. As a result, the SEC and regulators determined that these misstatements misled investors about Wells Fargo’s true financial health and risk exposure. Wells Fargo was forced to pay $3 billion in penalties to settle these investigations. In addition, CEO John Stumpf resigned, and several high-ranking executives were dismissed.